Post-Quantum Cryptography
Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) refers to cryptographic algorithms that are secure against attacks by both classical and quantum computers. This document covers the major families of post-quantum cryptographic algorithms and their implementations.
Lattice-Based Cryptography
Learning With Errors (LWE)
- Security: Based on the hardness of solving noisy linear equations
- Parameters:
- Dimension (n): 512-1024
- Modulus (q): 2^23-2^32
- Error distribution: Discrete Gaussian
Python Implementation (LWE Encryption)
import numpy as np
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives import hashes
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.kdf.hkdf import HKDF
import secrets
class LWE:
def __init__(self, n=512, q=2**32-1):
self.n = n # Dimension
self.q = q # Modulus
def keygen(self):
# Generate secret key (small coefficients)
s = np.random.randint(-1, 2, size=self.n)
# Generate public key (A, b = A*s + e)
A = np.random.randint(0, self.q, size=(self.n, self.n))
e = np.random.normal(0, 3.2, size=self.n).astype(int)
b = (A @ s + e) % self.q
return (A, b), s
def encrypt(self, pk, m):
A, b = pk
r = np.random.randint(0, 2, size=self.n)
u = (A.T @ r) % self.q
v = (b @ r + m * (self.q // 2)) % self.q
return (u, v)
def decrypt(self, s, ct):
u, v = ct
return 0 if (v - s @ u) % self.q < self.q // 2 else 1
NTRU (N-th Degree Truncated Polynomial Ring)
- Security: Based on the shortest vector problem in a lattice
- Parameters:
- N: 509-1277 (polynomial degree)
- q: 2048-12289 (modulus)
Hash-Based Cryptography
SPHINCS+
- Type: Stateless hash-based signature scheme
- Security: Based on hash function security
- Parameters:
- Hash function: SHA-256, SHAKE-256, or Haraka
- Signature size: 8-41 KB
Go Implementation (SPHINCS+ Signature)
package main
import (
"crypto/rand"
"fmt"
"github.com/cloudflare/circl/sign/sphincsplus"
)
func main() {
// Select security level (128, 192, or 256 bits)
mode := sphincsplus.SHAKE256s
// Generate key pair
publicKey, privateKey, err := sphincsplus.GenerateKey(rand.Reader, mode)
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
// Sign message
message := []byte("Sign this message with SPHINCS+")
signature := sphincsplus.Sign(privateKey, message)
// Verify signature
valid := sphincsplus.Verify(publicKey, message, signature)
fmt.Printf("Signature valid: %v\n", valid)
}
Code-Based Cryptography
Classic McEliece
- Security: Based on decoding random linear codes
- Parameters:
- n: 3488-8192 (code length)
- k: 2720-6528 (dimension)
- t: 64-128 (error correction capability)
Multivariate Cryptography
Rainbow Signature Scheme
- Security: Based on solving systems of multivariate quadratic equations
- Parameters:
- v1: Number of vinegar variables in first layer
- o1, o2: Number of oil variables in each layer
- q: Finite field size (typically 256)
Isogeny-Based Cryptography
SIKE (Supersingular Isogeny Key Encapsulation)
- Security: Based on computing isogenies between supersingular elliptic curves
- Parameters:
- p: Large prime of form 2^a * 3^b * f - 1
- l1, l2: Small primes (typically 2 and 3)
Implementation Challenges
1. LWE Parameter Selection
- Task: Implement parameter selection for LWE-based schemes
- Challenge: Balance security and performance
- Target: 128-bit post-quantum security
2. NTRU Key Generation
- Task: Implement NTRU key generation with protection against key recovery attacks
- Challenge: Ensure proper parameter selection to prevent lattice reduction attacks
3. SPHINCS+ Optimization
- Task: Optimize SPHINCS+ for embedded systems
- Challenge: Reduce signature size while maintaining security
Migration to Post-Quantum Cryptography
Hybrid Schemes
- Approach: Combine classical and post-quantum algorithms
- Example: ECDH + Kyber for key exchange
- Benefits: Maintains security against both classical and quantum attacks
Performance Considerations
- Key Sizes: Post-quantum keys are typically larger
- Computational Overhead: Some PQC algorithms require more computation
- Bandwidth: Larger keys and signatures increase communication overhead